CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 240 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Intramedullary nailing with standard SIGN nail +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03861624
NCT03861624N/ACompleted

Intramedullary Nailing Versus External Fixation in the Treatment of Open Tibia Fractures in Tanzania - Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

University of California, San Francisco·interventional·Posted Mar 4, 2019·Updated Jul 28, 2022

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Intramedullary nailing with standard SIGN nail and External Fixation with uniplanar Dispofix external fixator for Tibial Fractures and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 240 participants.

Detailed Summary

The investigators propose to undertake a randomized, controlled trial which will generate Level 1 evidence concerning optimal fixation methods for the treatment of severe open tibia fractures in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The investigators hope to determine the optimal management of severe open tibial fractures in Sub-Saharan Africa in order to reduce long-term disability, limit the economic impact of injury, and avoid resource costs of reoperation. The investigators plan to compare the all-cause reoperation rate for AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) Type 42 open tibial shaft fractures treated with initial intramedullary nailing versus external fixation at Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, to compare rates of secondary clinical endpoints including postoperative superficial and deep infection, clinical union, radiographic union, malunion, and health-related quality of life with minimum one year follow-up, and identify prognostic factors related to the patient, injury, or management protocol that impact the reoperation rate, return to work, and health-related quality of life.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
Countries--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 4, 2019
Enrollment StartDec 17, 2015
Primary CompletionMar 25, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 7.3 years ago

Interventions

Intramedullary nailing with standard SIGN nailprocedure

Patients meeting eligibility requirements are randomized to either study arm. Patients receive definitive fixation of AO/OTA-42 open tibia diaphyseal fractures using the standard SIGN nail (SIGN Fracture Care International, Richland, WA). The number of interlocking screws is at the discretion of the treating surgeon, who also has the option to use an external fixator for damage control, and later conversion to IMN when clinically appropriate. The experimental group procedure is less common in the study setting, and thus, viewed as the experimental group.

External Fixation with uniplanar Dispofix external fixatorprocedure

Patients meeting eligibility requirements are randomized to either study arm. Patients receive definitive fixation of AO/OTA-42 open tibia diaphyseal fractures using the uniplanar Dispofix external fixator with two Shanz screws placed proximally and two Schanz screws placed distally to fracture site with a single stainless steel bar.The active comparator group procedure is more common in the study setting, and thus, viewed as the comparator group.