CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 86 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Visual Scanning Testother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03931798
NCT03931798N/ACompleted

The Visual Scanning Test: a Neuropsychological Tool to Assess Extrapersonal Visual Unilateral Spatial Neglect

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus·interventional·Posted Apr 30, 2019·Updated May 7, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Visual Scanning Test for Spatial Neglect. Completed, enrolled 86 participants.

Detailed Summary

Presentation and standardization on a normative sample of a new neuropsychological tool to provide a quantitative assessment of visual unilateral spatial neglect in the extrapersonal portion of space.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsSpatial Neglect
Countries--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 30, 2019
Enrollment StartNov 2, 2015
Primary CompletionJan 15, 2017
Study CompletionJan 9, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.2 yearsPosted 7.2 years ago

Interventions

Visual Scanning Testother

The Visual Scanning Test (VST) involved a visual search for a target between similar visual distractors, projected in the far space, so as to simulate the search within a visual field. It is overall composed by four trials, each trial contained 20 cases and made up by 20 stimuli. On about the 80% of cases, the test provided the presence of target in the left, center or in right hemispace. In the remaining 20% of cases, the test provided the presence of a catch trial (absence of the target), to assess the presence of frontal disturbances or malingering. The test is constructed according to an increasing attentional load for the target on the left-hemispace. Participants, sitting in front a blank wall, were required to actively and free explore the projected visual field to search for the visual target, naming its identification (saying YES or NO). During the task, the examiner annotated the reaction times and the errors.