At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Electromyography-based TetraGraph and Acceleromyography-based TOF-Watch SX Neuromuscular Monitors Under Clinical Conditions
In Brief
An observational study evaluating neuromuscular blockade monitoring for Neuromuscular Blockade. Completed, enrolled 50 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Anesthesiologists are often required to give certain drugs, called muscle relaxants to the patients for surgery. These drugs make the people weak for the procedure to make the work of the surgeon easier and prevent unexpected movements. The effect of these drugs must be terminated by the end of the procedures to ensure that the patients can breathe normally. Over the years several monitors have been developed to monitor the effect of these drugs. The monitors use different principles to measure muscle function. Some monitors are integrated into anesthesia machines while others are battery-operated, portable devices. The aim of the present study is two compare monitors using different technologies. Both monitors stimulate a peripheral nerve at the wrist that makes the thumb twitch. The older device (TOF-Watch SX) measures the acceleration of thumb movement, the new device (TetraGraph) measures the electrical activity of the muscle that moves the thumb. The two devices will be connected so that with one simulation both types of signals can be recorded and analyzed. The monitors will be used during the surgeries as described by the manufacturer. The study will not influence the surgical procedure or the anesthetic of the patients. The aim of the study is to collect data on how the two monitors correlate, since they measure neuromuscular function by different technologies (acceleromyography and electromyography).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Neuromuscular blockade monitoring via two different types of monitoring devices