CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/AActive· 300 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Physical measurement +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04012151
NCT04012151N/AActive

Arm and Finger Measurement for Blood Pressure Surveillance

KK Women's and Children's Hospital·observational·Posted Jul 9, 2019·Updated Oct 9, 2024

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Physical measurement and Cuff size fitting for Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced. Active but no longer recruiting, targeting 300 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is critical in peripartum care. The cuff and bladder sizes affects the accuracy of BP measurement. Current international BP measurement recommendations are based on mid-arm circumference (MAC). However, evidence have shown the discrepancies between these sizes, leading to inaccuracy of BP measurement. This study will measure arm and finger size of 300 parturients in third trimester to determine whether the MAC, finger measurement or body mass index (BMI) is the best clinical predictor for non-standard cuff sizes for BP measurement.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSingapore
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/AActive
20202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedJul 9, 2019
Enrollment StartJul 10, 2019
Primary CompletionDec 11, 2019
Study CompletionDec 31, 2026
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 5 monthsPosted 7.0 years ago

Interventions

Physical measurementother

Parturients of gestational week \>= 32 weeks will have their arms and fingers measured to generate the conicity index.

Cuff size fittingother

Fit on arm cuff and finger cuff as selected by investigators based on the measurement.