At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 64 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopydevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparative Study of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac Video Laryngoscopy With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre·interventional·Posted Oct 30, 2019·Updated Jul 8, 2020
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopy for Paediatric Airway. Completed, enrolled 64 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPaediatric Airway
CountriesMalaysia
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJun 2019
First PostedOct 2019
Primary CompletionDec 2019
Study CompletionJan 2020
TodayJul 2026
First PostedOct 30, 2019
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2019
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2019
Study CompletionJan 1, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 6.7 years ago
Interventions
Glidescope video laryngoscopy/ C-MAC video laryngoscopydevice
usage of said devices according to manual