At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site Preparation Protocol During Dental Implant Placement. A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating osseodensification protocol and conventional implant site preparation protocol for Bone Density and Implant Stability. Completed, enrolled 22 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The present study is a human, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted to explore and compare the clinical and radiological outcome of Osseodensification protocol with conventional implant site preparation protocol. The trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Local anaesthesia was administered and mucoperiosteal flap was reflected. Implant osteotomies was performed with sequential drilling with osseodensification protocol at 1100 rpm. The pilot drill was used in clockwise direction and the other sequential drills were used in counter clockwise direction under copious irrigation. Flap closure was achieved using 3-0 silk sutures to protect the implant site.
Local anaesthesia was administered and mucoperiosteal flap was reflected. Implant osteotomies was performed with sequential drilling with conventional implant site preparation protocol at 1100 rpm. The pilot drill was used in clockwise direction and the other sequential drills were used in clockwise direction under copious irrigation. Flap closure was achieved using 3-0 silk sutures to protect the implant site.