At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 32 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of the TOFCuff Monitor Versus Electromyography in Neuromuscular Monitoring
In Brief
An observational study for Neuromuscular Blockade. Completed, enrolled 32 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Mechanomyography (MMG) is considered the gold-standard for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) monitoring. However, it is quite bulky and difficult to use on a routine basis. Therefore, alternative methods like Acceleromyography (AMG), Electromyography (EMG) and the TOF-CUFF method have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the TOF-Cuff monitor and Electromyography (EMG-NMT module with the CARESCAPE B450 monitor) data following rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade and its reversal.
Study Details
Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsNeuromuscular Blockade
CountriesSpain
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJan 2020
First PostedFeb 2020
Primary CompletionMay 2020
TodayJul 2026
First PostedFeb 24, 2020
Enrollment StartJan 15, 2020
Primary CompletionMay 10, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 monthsPosted 6.4 years ago