At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Control group without use of VSP and Treatment Group with use of VSP for Mandibular Fractures. Completed, enrolled 28 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare operating room time between conventional treatment techniques \[without Virtual surgical Planning (VSP)\] versus treatment with use of Virtual surgical Planning (VSP) in patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The control group will include patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) in standard fashion (without virtual surgical planning assistance and occlusal splint)
The treatment group corresponds to patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) utilizing virtual surgical planning via 3D Systems, bite registration and fabrication of occlusal splint via intraoral digital scanner, and mandibular hardware