CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 57 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Device: Randomization between prosthetic componentsprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04322799
NCT04322799N/ACompleted

A Randomized Controlled RSA Study Comparing the 2nd Generation Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene to Conventional Polyethylene in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty

Umeå University·interventional·Posted Mar 26, 2020·Updated Apr 1, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Device: Randomization between prosthetic components for Osteoarthritis, Hip and Arthroplasty Complications. Completed, enrolled 57 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

A prospective randomized study comparing two types of cemented acetabular components, a highly-crosslinked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Primary outcome are component wear measured by RSA, secondary outcomes are migration and complications. Patients are evaluated 5 years postoperatively.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSweden
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 26, 2020
Enrollment StartFeb 7, 2013
Primary CompletionDec 4, 2014
Study CompletionJun 30, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 6.3 years ago

Interventions

Device: Randomization between prosthetic componentsprocedure

Patients are randomized between two types of cup components in total hip arthroplasty. Identical cups made of either highly-crosslinked polyethylene or conventional polyethylene.