At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Unroofing Curettage Versus Modified Limberg Flap in Pilonidal Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Un-roofing curettage method and Modified Limberg Flap Group for Pilonidal Disease. Completed, enrolled 278 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
In our hospital, between January 2013 and January 2017, those operated with the Modified Limberg flap method after the Rhomboid excision due to pilonidal disease, and those operated with the un-roofing curettage method will be screened retrospectively. Patients will be divided into two groups as Un-roofing curettage group (UC group) and the Modified Limberg Flap group (LF group). Operation time, hospital stay time, return to work time, recovery time, Time to walk without pain, days, Time to sit on the toilet without pain, days, Postoperative VAS and recurrence will be compared between both groups
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
In this method, the roof of the pilonidal cyst is opened, and the inside is cleaned, and curettage is performed. The wound is closed with a dressing after hemostasis.
In this method, the pilonidal cyst is excised with a rhomboid incision and closed with the modified Limberg flap method.