CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 146 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Effects of shared book reading: Labelsbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04337372
NCT04337372N/ACompleted

Parent-infant Learning Dynamics During Early Shared Book Reading

University of Florida·interventional·Posted Apr 7, 2020·Updated Feb 6, 2025

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Effects of shared book reading: Labels for Individual, Category, and No-label Conditions. Completed, enrolled 146 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This work is guided by two specific aims and is expected to result in a better understanding of the effectiveness of shared book reading as a tool for supporting parent-infant interactions and infant learning across the first year of life. This work determined the extent to which books with individually-named characters (e.g., "Boris", "Fiona") increases parent-infant joint attention and infant selective attention relative to books with generic labels (e.g., "Bear", "Bear") or no labels and whether attention differs by age. During infant-parent shared book reading joint attention was measured using dual eye-tracking. Infants and parents then returned to the lab the next day and infant selective attention and infant-parent neural synchrony was measured using EEG.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 7, 2020
Enrollment StartFeb 8, 2022
Primary CompletionDec 14, 2023
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 6.2 years ago

Interventions

Effects of shared book reading: Labelsbehavioral

Book reading included objects labeled with 1) Individual labels, 2) Category labels, and 3) No Labels. Condition and infant age differences were examined.