CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 68 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Activator instrument +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04348097
NCT04348097N/ACompleted

Comparison of Dry Needling and Activator Trigger Point Therapy on Upper Trapezius Trigger Points.

Riphah International University·interventional·Posted Apr 15, 2020·Updated Apr 15, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Activator instrument and dry needle for Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial. Completed, enrolled 68 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Dry needling and Activator trigger point therapy on upper trapezius trigger points.Randomized controlled trial was conducted on Sixty-eight patients with active upper trapezius trigger points meeting the inclusion criteria i.e Age limit 20-45 both genders, presence of unilateral or bilateral upper trapezius Trigger Points. For bilateral presence of trigger points, the more painful side was selected. If more than one trigger points were present on the side to be treated, most painful trigger point was treated. Patients fulfilling essential criteria to identify the trigger points. According to Simon's criteria, which included a palpable taut band that was detected with palpation, the presence of a sensitive nodule in the taut band which was determined with algometry and referral pain. Exclusion criteria was specific neck pain, e.g. radiculopathy, systemic or inflammatory pain., evidence of spinal cord compression, recent neck surgery or trauma, long-term use of corticosteroids, anticoagulant use, e.g. Warfarin, presence of a blood coagulation disorder, contraindication for needling such as local infection, pregnancy with threatened abortion. Participants were selected by purposive sampling, group randomization using lottery method technique. All the participants were assessed using Numeric pain rating scale to measure pain, algometer to measure pain pressure threshold and inclinometer to measure cervical lateral flexion range of motion. A demographic form was used to collect data from patients. Patients were randomly assigned in dry needling and activator therapy group. Treatment was given at a frequency of 2 sessions per week and total 6 sessions were given to both group during a course of 3 weeks. The data was analyzed using SPSS 21.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesPakistan
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 15, 2020
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2019
Primary CompletionNov 1, 2019
Study CompletionFeb 20, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 monthsPosted 6.2 years ago

Interventions

Activator instrumentdevice

activator instrument was placed perpendicular over the identified trigger point and 10 thrusts were delivered, with a rate of one thrust per second

dry needledevice

By wrist flexion and extension movements, the trigger point was needled in different directions and tried to elicit at least one local twitch response during the procedure and patient's familiar referral pain was tried to obtain . Each dry needling procedure lasted 1-2 minutes