At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Human Coronavirus Immune Plasma (HCIP) vs. Control (SARS-CoV-2 Non-immune) Plasma Among Outpatients With Symptomatic COVID-19
In Brief
A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma and Plasma from a volunteer donor for SARS-CoV 2. Completed, enrolled 1,225 participants across 29 sites.
Detailed Summary
To assess the efficacy and safety of Human coronavirus immune plasma (HCIP) to reduce the risk of hospitalization or death, the duration of symptoms and duration of nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal viral shedding.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (1 cup; minimum of 175 mL collected by apheresis from a volunteer who recovered from COVID-19 disease and has SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers ≥ 1:320 and after July 2021 meets FDA criteria for high titer plasma.
Plasma collected from a volunteer donor prior to January 1, 2020 will not be tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Plasma collected after December 31, 2019 will be confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 seronegative.