At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
SIS Versus Office Hysteroscopy for Uterine Cavity Evaluation Prior to IVF: a Randomized Control Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Office hysteroscopy for Infertility. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Saline infusion sonography (SIS) and hysteroscopy are commonly employed methods for uterine cavity evaluation. While hysteroscopy is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of intra-uterine pathology, it is not often used as an initial screening tool because of provider concerns about in-office tolerability, operating room costs, and use of anesthesia. The investigators aim to compare SIS and office hysteroscopy with respect to patient and provider satisfaction. Additionally, the investigators aim to assess the capability of office-based hysteroscopy to manage intra-uterine pathology at the time of diagnosis and reduce delays and supernumerary procedures.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Use of hysteroscopy in the clinical setting to directly visualize the cavity. If pathology amenable to immediate treatment is visualize, removal will be attempted by hysteroscopic graspers.