At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 46 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Evone +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Flow Controlled Ventilation Versus Pressure Controlled Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery With One Lung Ventilation - a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Evone and Primus for Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic. Completed, enrolled 46 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This trial investigates effects of individualized (by compliance guided pressure settings) flow-controlled ventilation compared to best clinical practice pressure-controlled ventilation in thoracic surgery requiring one lung ventilation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPositive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic
CountriesAustria
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 2020
Enrollment StartOct 2020
Primary CompletionFeb 2022
TodayJul 2026
First PostedSep 1, 2020
Enrollment StartOct 29, 2020
Primary CompletionFeb 16, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 5.8 years ago
Interventions
Evonedevice
Airway ventilation device
Primusdevice
Airway ventilation device