At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of an Ultra-rapid Polymerizing Resin Composite
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Direct restorative treatment with fast-curing composites (Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow) and Direct restorative treatment with conventionally applied composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill) for Caries and Defective Tooth Restorations. Completed, enrolled 51 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The objective of this 2-year split mouth comparative study, a randomized controlled study, is to determine whether the simplified placement procedure of the ultra-rapid polymerizing Tetric PowerFlow/ Tetric PowerFill with a reduced light polymerization time (3 s), yields the same clin-ical results as widely used commercially available dental composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill) requiring up to 40 seconds of light polymerization time.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow (test group) was cured for 3 s.
Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill (control group) were conventionally cured for 10 s per increment.