At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Comparative Study of the Findings of Dynamic Electrocardiography (Holter System) Using the an Innovative 3-lead Wireless Water Resistant Device and a Conventional Device
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating An innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant Holter device and A conventional device for Cardiac Arrhythmia. Completed, enrolled 231 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Holter monitoring is one of the most widely used diagnostic methods to detect cardiac arrhythmias. Newer Holter monitors may provide some advantages over the more traditional ones. This study will compare the findings of a Holter exam using an innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant device with a conventional device.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The participant will use the innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant Holter device simultaneously with the conventional Holter device for 24 hours.
The participant will use the innovative 3-lead wireless water resistant Holter device simultaneously with the conventional Holter device for 24 hours.