CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04743284
NCT04743284N/ACompleted

The Agreement Between Face-to-Face and Tele-Assessment of Balance Tests in Patient With Multiple Sclerosis

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa·observational·Posted Feb 8, 2021·Updated Mar 21, 2024

In Brief

An observational study for Multiple Sclerosis. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

MS is characterized by clinical symptoms caused by lesions of the brain, spinal cord, or optic nerves that can affect balance, gait, and risk of falls. 50-80% of patients with MS have different levels of balance-related pathological findings. In addition, the imbalance is one of the most complained about findings by MS patients. Balance and postural control disorders are the most common signs in patients with cerebellar tract damage. Many patients have reported problems with balance and gait causing serious disability. Therefore, disorders of balance and postural control in patients with MS are associated with difficulty in standing and performing functional activities. Effective quantitative methods are needed to assess postural imbalance to help clinicians assess the progression of this disorder. Current literature suggests that home tele-rehabilitation and tele-medicine practices may be an alternative method effective enough to be equivalent to face-to-face physiotherapy treatments for patients with Ms. The advantages of Tele-medicine over normal care include increased social support, participant engagement, quality of care, cost-effectiveness, access to services (due to lack of transportation), and reducing the burden on healthcare professionals to make services easier to deploy. In cases such as Pandemic conditions, where face-to-face service is disrupted in clinics, tele-rehabilitation can be applied as a suitable alternative treatment method accessible to patients. The effectiveness of Tele-rehabilitation raises the question of whether tele-evaluation is as effective and accurate as in the clinic. Studies examining the effectiveness of Tele-assesment are still insufficient. The study is planned to address this deficiency. The aim of this study is to compare the results of MS patients by applying valid and reliable methods used in balance assessment with face-to-face and online access methods, thereby investigating the effectiveness of balance assessment through online access. The hypothesis in this study is that the results of the balance assessment with online access in MS patients will be consistent with the results of the balance assessment conducted face-to-face. H0: Tele-assessments of balance do not give the same results as face-to-face balance assessments in MS patients. H1: Tele-assessments of balance do not give the same results as face-to-face balance assessments in MS patients.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 8, 2021
Enrollment StartMar 5, 2021
Primary CompletionJan 16, 2022
Study CompletionMar 7, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 10 monthsPosted 5.4 years ago