CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 107 enrolled
Drug / intervention
4% liposomal lidocaine cream +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04766684
NCT04766684Phase 4Completed

A Randomized Comparison of Local Anesthetic Options for Clubfoot Tenotomy: Needle-Free Jet Injection Versus Topical Cream

Vanderbilt University Medical Center·interventional·Posted Feb 23, 2021·Updated May 5, 2026

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Jet injection of 1% lidocaine and 4% liposomal lidocaine cream for Clubfoot. Completed, enrolled 107 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Infants undergoing Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot often require percutaneous tendoachilles lengthening (TAL) after serial casting. This procedure is frequently performed in the office with a local anesthetic to avoid exposure to general anesthesia in the operating room. Topical anesthetic creams are commonly used to provide local analgesia for this procedure. The cream is applied to the infant's skin around the achilles tendon and requires 30 minutes to provide adequate analgesia, reaching a depth of up to 5 mm at maximum effect. An alternative is a needle-free jet injection system that uses compressed CO2 to push 0.25 ml of lidocaine into the skin, providing local analgesia at the site of administration. This method likewise provides analgesia to the site of application at a depth of 5-8 mm, yet only takes approximately 1-2 minutes to achieve maximum effect. Aim 1: Determine which pain management method, topical anesthetic cream (4% liposomal lidocaine) vs. jet infection of local anesthesia (1% lidocaine), provides the greatest pain relief to infants with clubfoot undergoing an in-office percutaneous TAL. Hypothesis: Jet injection will provide equal or greater pain control when compared topical anesthetic cream. Aim 2: Determine if there is a difference in the rate of adverse events between the two pain management methods, topical anesthetic cream (4% liposomal lidocaine) vs. jet infection of local anesthesia (1% lidocaine). Hypothesis: Jet injection of local anesthesia will not be associated with an increased rate of adverse events in comparison to topical anesthetic cream. If jet injection of local anesthesia is shown to provide comparable or better pain control without an increase in adverse events, use of this needle-free injection system will decrease the overall length of the procedure visit, thus increasing quality, safety, and value.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsClubfoot
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 23, 2021
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2021
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.2 yearsPosted 5.4 years ago

Interventions

Jet injection of 1% lidocainedevice

Jet injection of 1% lidocaine

4% liposomal lidocaine creamdrug

4% liposomal lidocaine cream