At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison Of Standart Technique, Ultrasonography And Near-Infrared Light In Difficult Peripheral Vascular Access: A Randomised Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Ultrasound group and Near Infrared Device Group for Vascular Access. Completed, enrolled 270 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any difference between the use of standard techniques, ultrasonography and infra-red light for the success of the first attempt in difficult peripheral vascular access patients. Patients who have difficult vascular access history ( often need 2 or more attempt to access peripheral intravenous catheter), who do not have palpable or visible vein after tourniquet, and who have the hard anticipation according to operator ( easy-moderate-hard) are included to study. The primary objective is planned as the determination of the success rate in the first attempt. Secondary aims of the study were determined as: total procedure time,total number of attempts, and need for rescue procedure
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
In the ultrasound group, the nurses will insert the cannulas to the peripheral veins as horizontally and longitudinally with the linear probe.
In the near infrared device group, the nurses will insert the cannulas to the peripheral veins with AccuVein AV 400.