At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Retrospective Review of Rib Fracture Pain Management at a London Major Trauma Centre Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Blocks, Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks and Epidurals
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Regional Anaesthesia for Rib Fractures and Pain, Acute. Completed, enrolled 389 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is widely considered to be the current gold standard treatment for rib fracture pain and is used in the Imperial invasive treatment pathway for rib fractures. However, TEA are often contraindicated due to other injuries or the use of anticoagulant medications, which also contraindicates other invasive nerve block techniques e.g. paravertebral catheters. A number of case reports have reported the safe use of alternative techniques such as Serratus Anterior Blocks (SAPB) and Erector Spinae Blocks (ESPB) and the anaesthesia community has taken them up widely based on this relatively limited evidence. In view of this, Womack et al recently published a large retrospective review examining the safety and efficacy of ultrasound guided paravertebral catheter analgesia techniques in rib fracture management along with small numbers of ESPBs. However, this data did not report the analgesic efficacy, patient reported pain relief or respiratory complications.The goal is to advance this body of evidence by reviewing our larger data set concerning the use of TEA and alternative regional techniques such as ESPB and SAPB. This comprehensive review will benefit patients by documenting the efficacy and safety of these techniques for clinicians managing rib fracture patients.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Thoracic epidural/Erector Spinae block/Serratus Anterior block