At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Can Distraction Substitute for Procedural Sedation and Improve Tolerance in Patients Receiving Epidural Steroid Injection for Pain? A Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Virtual reality, Intravenous sedation, and 1 other intervention for Lower Back Pain and Lumbar Radiculopathy. Completed, enrolled 146 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study examines the impact of virtual reality compared to sedation (midazolam and/or fentanyl) and no intervention on pain experienced from an epidural steroid injection (ESI). The intervention group (who receive virtual reality as a distraction modality) is compared to a sedation group and a control group.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Subjects in the virtual reality group will be offered a variety of immersive environments to choose from (mountains, beach, rainforest and temperate forest) in addition to local anesthetic.
Sedation will be administered using low-dose midazolam and/ or fentanyl. We will use a wide range of dosing (1-5 mg for midazolam, up to 150 mcg for fentanyl) to maximize generalizability and account for widespread variability in clinical circumstances, medical practice and patient response (personalized medicine). Sedation will be titrated to effect by a board-certified or eligible anesthesiologist so that patients remain responsive to verbal stimuli.
Patients will receive superficial local anesthetic with 1% lidocaine. Local anesthetic will be administered by the physician performing the procedure titrated to patient comfort.