CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 90 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Low Arousal +2 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT04911439
NCT04911439N/ACompleted

Influencia de Los Niveles de Alerta en el Aprendizaje Motor de Una Tarea Manual Precisa, en la Memoria a Corto y Largo Plazo y en la Capacidad de Imaginación Motora

Susana Nunez Nagy·interventional·Posted Jun 3, 2021·Updated Mar 22, 2022

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Low Arousal, Medium arousal, and 1 other intervention for Arousal. Completed, enrolled 90 participants across 4 sites in 2 countries.

Detailed Summary

In motor learning is essential to consider that movements are produced by the cooperation and combination of many brain structures and are influenced by the emotions to which individuals are subjected. Several neural circuits have been identified that closely link the emotional system and the motion control system. Arousal is associated with many emotional responses and has effects on the nervous and motor system. In line with the "Inverted 'U' Hypothesis", all levels of both high and low arousal do not allow optimal task performance, yet moderate levels lead to excellent performance. Arousal also plays a vital role in movement learning, where a critical element is memory. There is evidence that a minimum level of arousal is required to encode or record information and that that moderate levels of arousal improve memory. Understanding how movement, emotions and interactions are regulated is significant because of the large number of movements humans perform. Of these, manual tasks represent precise movements that require the integration of many elements by the nervous system to perform these tasks successfully. How different levels of arousal influence the way manual tasks are learned is still unknown. On the other hand, motor imagery (MI) is a cognitive process that is an important contributor to how movements are planned and executed. The use of MI has been recommended to improve movement learning and task execution. For an effective and individualize MI program is imperative to know this capacity. However, how different levels of arousal can affect our motor imagery ability is also still unknown. The main objective of this study is to determine and quantify the effects of arousal levels in the learning of a precise manual task not previously trained on four parameters of fine motor control: time, error, speed, and accuracy. On the other hand, the aim is to determine if the ability of internal visual, external visual, and kinaesthetic imagery varies when participants are subjected to different levels of arousal. Researches expect that non-anxious, non-stressed participants who are shown images that elicit an optimal level of arousal will show better motor performance on the fine motor task and better motor imagery ability. In contrast, researches expect that participants without anxiety and stress who are shown pictures that elicit a sub-optimal level of arousal will show poorer motor performance on the fine motor task and poorer motor imagery ability.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsArousal
CountriesFrance, Spain

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20222023202420252026
First PostedJun 3, 2021
Enrollment StartJun 14, 2021
Primary CompletionMar 18, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 5.1 years ago

Interventions

Low Arousalother

This group will see affective images of the International Affective Picture System with low arousal level

Medium arousalother

This group will see affective images of the International Affective Picture System with medium arousal level

High arousalother

This group will see affective images of the International Affective Picture System with high arousal level