At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Better Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy Evaluation of Stenting (BLUES) A Pragmatic Randomized Multi-center Comparative Effectiveness Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Silicone (Coloplast Imajin Hydro) ureteral stent and Non-silicone (Polyurethane/Percuflex) ureteral stent (any manufacturer) for Renal Stone and Ureteral Stone. Completed, enrolled 224 participants across 10 sites.
Detailed Summary
This multi-center trial is being completed to compare patient outcomes related to the Imajin silicone stent in comparison to non-silicone polyurethane stents after ureteroscopy. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the Imajin silicone stent or a non-silicone stent. In addition, the participants will complete questionnaires and have follow-up information collected (approximately 60 days after surgery). The trial hypothesizes that a ureteral stent made of silicone, will have superior outcomes when compared to non-silicone stents.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
During the end of the standard of care ureteroscopy the silicone stent will be placed.
During the end of the standard of care ureteroscopy the Non-silicone (Polyurethane/Percuflex) stent will be placed.