At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 43,789 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cemented THA +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Age-based Cut-off Point as Methodological Approach in Search for Differences in Mortality and Revision for Fixation Type: Cemented Versus Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Cemented THA and Unemented THA for Hip Osteoarthritis. Completed, enrolled 43,789 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The goal of this study is to apply the regression discontinuity design (RD) methodology on arthroplasty registry data. The investigators aim to use an age-based cut-off for fixation type choice and estimate the causal effect of fixation type on short term mortality and revision, using a fuzzy regression discontinuity design.
Study Details
Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsHip Osteoarthritis
CountriesNetherlands
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
Enrollment StartJan 2007
Primary CompletionDec 2019
First PostedNov 2021
TodayJul 2026
First PostedNov 4, 2021
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2007
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 12.9 yearsPosted 4.7 years ago
Interventions
Cemented THAprocedure
THA with cement fixation
Unemented THAprocedure
THA with uncemented / pressfit fixation