At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A One Year Randomized Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating X-tra base & GrandioSO reinforced by Ribbond for Dental Restoration Failure. Completed, enrolled 28 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of this study will be to evaluate the clinical performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus bulk fill resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The missing peripheral tooth structure will be built up via 2-mm wedge-shaped a universal hybrid resin composite, GrandioSO . Then the polyethylene fibers will be wetted with an unfilled resin first . After removing the excess resin, fibers will be covered with a very thin layer of flowable composite X-tra base . After that, fibers will be bonded immediately against the peripheral missing walls and cured for 20 seconds. Then a bulk-fill flowable resin composite lining X-tra base will be applied in approximately 4 mm thick in bulk increments as needed to fill the cavity 2 mm short of the occlusal cavosurface and each increment will be light cured for 20 s. The remaining occlusal part of the cavity will be restored with a universal hybrid resin composite, GrandioSO . The shade of the composite will be selected according to the teeth to be restored. All cavities will be restored with open-sandwich technique (Deliperi, et al. 2017).