CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 88 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Splint retained by Bulk-fill flowable +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT05305586
NCT05305586N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Comparison of Bulk-fill Flowable and Packable Composite in Splinting of Luxation Injuries: A Randomised Control Trial

Dow University of Health Sciences·interventional·Posted Mar 31, 2022·Updated Sep 11, 2023

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Splint retained by Bulk-fill flowable and Splint retained by Packable Composite for Dental Trauma and Splints. Completed, enrolled 88 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The objectives of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) were: 1. To compare the efficiency of splinting by two composite materials in terms of retention of material 2. To compare adhesive point dimension between the two groups 3. To compare time taken to place and remove the splint 4. To assess the efficacy of bulkfill flowable in reducing mobility of luxated teeth.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsDental Trauma, Splints
CountriesPakistan
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 31, 2022
Enrollment StartJul 9, 2019
Primary CompletionApr 20, 2020
Study CompletionMay 4, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 4.3 years ago

Interventions

Splint retained by Bulk-fill flowabledevice

Luxated teeth were splinted with bulk-fill flowable composite

Splint retained by Packable Compositedevice

Luxated teeth were splinted with packable composite