At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol vs. Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients With COPD-asthma Phenotype vs. Emphysema Phenotype. A Controled Clinical Trial.
In Brief
A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol 100/25 mcgs and Umeclidinium/Vilanterol 62.5/25 mcgs for COPD. Completed, enrolled 133 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This is a randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial for mexican COPD patients. Biomass smoke associated COPD (BS-COPD) clinical spectrum is different to the one seen in tobacco smoke associated COPD (TS-COPD). BS-COPD patients present COPD-asthma phenotype or asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), TS-COPD patients present mostly the emphysema phenotype. BS-COPD patients have a greater risk of exacerbations in comparison to the emphysema phenotype. Therefore, individualizing treatment in both phenotypes may be very useful among the clinical practitioners. The investigators expect treatment with FF/V to be superior in preventing COPD exacerbations than the U/V combination in patients with COPD-asthma phenotype; andU/V to be superior than FF/V in patients with the emphysema phenotype. The general objective of the study is to determine the exacerbations outcome in patients with COPD-asthma vs emphysema phenotype patients, treated with both drugs. Secondary objectives include assessment of pulmonary function tests, quality of life, dyspnea and functional capacity change after a 24 weeks treatment.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Dry powder inhaler with 30 blisters. 100/25mcgs a day for 24 weeks.
Dry powder inhaler with 30 blisters. 62.5/25mcgs a day for 24 weeks