At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
The Accuracy of Static Computer-aided Implant Surgery Compared With Conventional Laboratory-guided Implant Surgery for Single-tooth Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Accuracy measurement for Dental Implant. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
To compare the static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and conventional laboratory-guided implant surgery (c-LIS) in terms of accuracy for single tooth replacement in posterior areas.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Three months following the implant placement, patients were called back to the implant clinic to record the actual implant position with the digital impression technique. Full mouth scans were done by using the intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The surface scans were then exported as an STL file and were imported to coDiagnostiX software. The "Treatment evaluation tool" function tool was used to measure the accuracy of the implant placement which measured the amount of deviation of the placed implant from the planned position. The outcomes were generated into three main parameters.