CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Accuracy measurementother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT05361226
NCT05361226N/ACompleted

The Accuracy of Static Computer-aided Implant Surgery Compared With Conventional Laboratory-guided Implant Surgery for Single-tooth Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mahidol University·interventional·Posted May 4, 2022·Updated May 4, 2022

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Accuracy measurement for Dental Implant. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

To compare the static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and conventional laboratory-guided implant surgery (c-LIS) in terms of accuracy for single tooth replacement in posterior areas.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsDental Implant
CountriesThailand
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 4, 2022
Enrollment StartJul 9, 2019
Primary CompletionJul 30, 2020
Study CompletionOct 30, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 4.2 years ago

Interventions

Accuracy measurementother

Three months following the implant placement, patients were called back to the implant clinic to record the actual implant position with the digital impression technique. Full mouth scans were done by using the intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The surface scans were then exported as an STL file and were imported to coDiagnostiX software. The "Treatment evaluation tool" function tool was used to measure the accuracy of the implant placement which measured the amount of deviation of the placed implant from the planned position. The outcomes were generated into three main parameters.