CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 76 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Food Ratingbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Key inclusion· 6
  • Child aged 8–10 years at enrollment
  • Child in good health based on parental self-report
  • No neurodevelopmental disorders (ADHD) or learning disabilities (dyslexia)
  • No allergies to foods or ingredients used in the study
Key exclusion· 8
  • Age outside 8–10 years (< 8 or > 10 years old at baseline)
  • Taking cold, allergy, or other medications affecting cognition, taste, appetite, or blood flow
  • Does not speak English
  • Colorblind

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT05456516
NCT05456516N/ACompleted

Neurocognitive and Behavioral Factors That Promote Resiliency to Pediatric Obesity

Penn State University·interventional·Posted Jul 13, 2022·Updated Apr 13, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Food Rating for Obesity, Childhood and Eating Behavior. Completed, enrolled 76 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Children from rural communities are at greater risk for obesity than children from more urban communities. However, some children are resilient to obesity despite greater exposure to obesogenic influences in rural communities (e.g., fewer community-level physical activity or healthy eating resources). Identifying factors that promote this resiliency could inform obesity prevention. Eating habits are learned through reinforcement (e.g., hedonic, familial environment), the process through which environmental food cues become valued and influence behavior. Therefore, understanding individual differences in reinforcement learning is essential to uncovering the causes of obesity. Preclinical models have identified two reinforcement learning phenotypes that may have translational importance for understanding excess consumption in humans: 1) goal-tracking-environmental cues have predictive value; and 2) sign-tracking-environmental cues have predictive and hedonic value (i.e., incentive salience). Sign-tracking is associated with poorer attentional control, greater impulsivity, and lower prefrontal cortex (PFC) engagement in response to reward cues. This parallels neurocognitive deficits observed in pediatric obesity (i.e., worse impulsivity, lower PFC food cue reactivity). The proposed research aims to determine if reinforcement learning phenotype (i.e., sign- and goal-tracking) is 1) associated with adiposity due to its influence on neural food cue reactivity, 2) associated with reward-driven overconsumption and meal intake due to its influence on eating behaviors; and 3) associated with changes in adiposity over 1 year. The investigators hypothesize that goal-tracking will promote resiliency to obesity due to: 1) reduced attribution of incentive salience and greater PFC engagement to food cues; and 2) reduced reward-driven overconsumption. Finally, the investigators hypothesize reinforcement learning phenotype will be associated due to its influence on eating behaviors associated with overconsumption (e.g., larger bites, faster bite rat and eating sped). To test this hypothesis, the investigators will enroll 76, 8-10-year-old children, half with healthy weight and half with obesity based on Centers for Disease Control definitions. Methods will include computer tasks to assess reinforcement learning, dual x-ray absorptiometry to assess adiposity, and neural food cue reactivity from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2023202420252026
First PostedJul 13, 2022
Enrollment StartJan 10, 2023
Primary CompletionDec 30, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.0 yearsPosted 4.0 years ago

Interventions

Food Ratingbehavioral

Children will rate foods on taste, health, and desire to eat. The order in which they rate the food characteristics is randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants