CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 102 enrolled
Drug / intervention
inguinal hernia repairprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT05504122
NCT05504122N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique in Long-term Follow-up

Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital·interventional·Posted Aug 17, 2022·Updated Aug 17, 2022

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating inguinal hernia repair for Hernia, Inguinal. Completed, enrolled 102 participants.

Detailed Summary

Open tension-free mesh repair (Lichtenstein) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair are the most commonly preferred techniques for inguinal hernia surgery. There's still a debate going on about which of these two techniques (open versus laparoscopic) is effective. This prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the early and long-term results of these two techniques (TEP vs. Lichtenstein).

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsHernia, Inguinal
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedAug 17, 2022
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2012
Primary CompletionDec 31, 2014
Study CompletionJan 1, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 yearsPosted 3.9 years ago

Interventions

inguinal hernia repairprocedure

Patients who will undergo inguinal hernia repair will be divided into two groups(TEP versus Lichtenstein) according to the technique to be applied