At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Effect of Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care on Oxygenation and Ventilation During Propofol-based Sedation for Colonoscopy in Patients With High Risk of Airway Obstruction: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Standard care with a facemask. and SuperNO2VA™EtCO2 (Nasal Oxygenating Ventilating Apparatus) for Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Obesity. Completed, enrolled 139 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to to compare oxygenation and ventilation on spontaneously ventilating obese patients or those with diagnosed or undiagnosed Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing day colonoscopy under Propofol based sedation, between the SuperNO2VA Et™ nasal positive airway pressure (PAP) device and routine care with face mask for oxygen (O2).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The anesthesia provider will supply oxygen via the closed facemask at 10 liters per minute (LPM)
The anesthesia provider will attach the SuperNO2VA™ EtCO2 circuit port to the hyperinflation bag with the oxygen flow rate to 10 L/min. The oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure, and ventilation of the subject will be done via SuperNO2VA™EtCO2 (Nasal Oxygenating Ventilating Apparatus)