PRGF VS CGF in Management of Labial Dehiscence Around Immediate Implants (Comparative Study) {PRGF= Plasma Rich in Growth Factors } {CGF=Concentrated Growth Factor}

Signals

Detailed Summary

The goal of this clinial trial is to detect Which one of two different platelet concentrate bio-membrane (first or third generation) is better in terms of marginal bone level and bone density around immediate implants in esthetic zone using Cone beam computerized tomography The plasma rich in growth factor or concentrated growth factor? 20 patients with nonrestorable maxillary tooth in the esthetic zone, Subjects will be enrolled The study will use simple randomization to allocate patients into 2 groups, each group will be included 10 patients: Group A: (concentrated growth factor group) ten patients indicated for immediate implant in the maxillary anterior region (class II socket), will be a candidate for immediate implant placement with CGF combined with xenogeneic bone graft Group B: (platelet-rich in growth factor group) Ten patients who indicated immediate implant in the maxillary anterior region (class I or class II socket), will be a candidate for immediate implant placement with PRGF combined with xenogeneic bone graft.

Study Details

Timeline

Arms & Interventions

Interventions