At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
UED-A Videolaryngoscopy +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating UED-A Videolaryngoscopy and Glidescope Videolaryngoscopy for Intubation; Difficult or Failed. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The present randomized clinical trial wants to compare the efficacy and safety of UED-A videolaryngoscope to Glidescope Titanium for routinely tracheal intubation in 60 adults, in terms of successful rate, no. attempts and manoeuvre duration.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsIntubation; Difficult or Failed
CountriesItaly
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2023202420252026
Enrollment StartFeb 2023
First PostedFeb 2023
Primary CompletionMay 2023
Study CompletionMay 2023
TodayJul 2026
First PostedFeb 10, 2023
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2023
Primary CompletionMay 12, 2023
Study CompletionMay 13, 2023
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 monthsPosted 3.4 years ago
Interventions
UED-A Videolaryngoscopydevice
Tracheal Intubation with UED-A videolaryngoscope
Glidescope Videolaryngoscopydevice
Tracheal Intubation with Glidescope Titanium videolaryngoscope