CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 495 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Adaptation of the Sabotage in Romantic Relationships Scale into Turkish and its validity and reliability analyzesother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT05795998
NCT05795998N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Turkish Adaptation of Romantic Relationship Sabotage Scale (T-RSS): Validity and Reliability Study

Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey·observational·Posted Apr 3, 2023·Updated Apr 3, 2023

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Adaptation of the Sabotage in Romantic Relationships Scale into Turkish and its validity and reliability analyzes for Unrecognized Condition. Completed, enrolled 495 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

In this cross-sectional and relationship-seeking study, it was aimed to adapt the Romantic Relationship Sabotage Scale (T-RSS), developed by Racquel Peel, into Turkish, for the reasons why partners sabotage the relationship in romantic relationships.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsUnrecognized Condition
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20222023202420252026
First PostedApr 3, 2023
Enrollment StartJan 15, 2022
Primary CompletionApr 15, 2022
Study CompletionJun 15, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 monthsPosted 3.2 years ago

Interventions

Adaptation of the Sabotage in Romantic Relationships Scale into Turkish and its validity and reliability analyzesother

Approval was obtained from the local ethics committee before starting the study. Permission was obtained from Racquel PEEL, who developed the scale. The scale was administered to 495 participants and they were informed about the study by a specialist psychiatrist. Language validity, construct validity and reliability analyzes of the scale were performed. The findings were discussed in the light of the literature.