At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 400 enrolled
Drug / intervention
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Rapid Sequence Intubation: an International, Multicenter Randomized Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation and Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade for Surgery. Completed, enrolled 400 participants across 2 sites.
Detailed Summary
The study seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade with the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsSurgery
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
202420252026
Enrollment StartMay 2023
First PostedMay 2023
Primary CompletionJun 2024
Study CompletionAug 2024
TodayJul 2026
First PostedMay 9, 2023
Enrollment StartMay 7, 2023
Primary CompletionJun 5, 2024
Study CompletionAug 5, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 3.1 years ago
Interventions
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubationdevice
Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh bladedevice
Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.