At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Comprehensive Protocol With Four Therapeutic Modalities for the Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Post-stroke Hemiplegic Patients
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Low-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation; Paraspinous block; Dry needling of spastic upper limb muscles; Muscular functional electrical stimulation (FES) and SHAM Low-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation; Paraspinous block; Dry needling of spastic upper limb muscles; Muscular functional electrical stimulation (FES) for Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity. Completed, enrolled 32 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The general objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the comprehensive protocol in improving post-stroke upper limb spasticity. The specific objectives were to evaluate pain improvement and changes in quality of life and functional capacity in patients who were subjected to the comprehensive protocol compared with those in the patients who underwent sham interventions.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
1. Low-frequency transcranial electrical stimulation (2/100 Hz) applied through 0.3-mm-diameter and 40-mm-long needles placed subcutaneously on the scalp at the projection of Penfield's motor homunculus and sensory and frontal supplementary motor associative areas. 2. Paraspinous block at the levels of the C5, C6 and C7 vertebrae concordant with spasticity laterality. 3. Dry needling of spastic upper limb muscles, as identified through a thorough physical examination, using 0.3-mm-diameter and 40-mm-long needles. 4. Muscular functional electrical stimulation (FES) in the antagonists of the upper limb muscles with spasticity with the following parameters: 20-Hz frequency, 300-µs pulse width, zero-second ramp time, 5-second stimulation time, and 5-second resting time.
For simulation of transcranial electrical stimulation and FES, electrodes were placed on the scalp and in the upper extremity muscles and were connected to a device similar to the real electric current generator. This device did not transmit any electric current but had blinking lights and produced sound to provide the subjects visual and auditory feedback. To simulate dry needling and paraspinous block, retractile needles were used.