CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 26 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Actual IPL +2 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06004895
NCT06004895N/ACompleted

Mechanisms of Action of Light-based Therapies in the Management of Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Aston University·interventional·Posted Aug 22, 2023·Updated Feb 5, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Actual IPL, Sham IPL, and 1 other intervention for Dry Eye Syndromes and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Completed, enrolled 26 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Dry eye disease is a common condition affecting millions worldwide and costing millions in healthcare due to reduced work productivity and quality of life. The disruption of oil glands in our eyelids known as Meibomian glands, which produce the oily layer of our tears to protect it from evaporating, is one of the most common contributors of dry eye disease. Much effort has been put into developing effective treatments for this condition as new treatments are constantly being introduced to the market. The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate how proven light-based therapies work in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption. These therapies include intense-pulsed light therapy (IPL) which uses a series of light flashes on the facial skin surface, and low-level light therapy (LLLT) which uses a mask with a series of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to warm the body cells. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What are the short- and long-term changes associated with these treatments on the eyelids and surface of the eyes? 2. Does LLLT alone work better than IPL+LLLT in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption? Participants with dry eye disease and oil gland disruption will receive four treatments with these light-based therapies each separated by two to three weeks apart, and followed up two to three weeks and three months after the final treatment session. One eye of the participant will receive intense pulsed light together with low-level light therapy, while the other eye will receive only low-level light therapy with a sham intense pulsed light treatment so that the researchers can compare if clinical signs and symptoms improve in one eye more than the other.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited Kingdom
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
202420252026
First PostedAug 22, 2023
Enrollment StartOct 25, 2023
Primary CompletionNov 29, 2024
Study CompletionDec 30, 2025
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 2.9 years ago

Interventions

Actual IPLdevice

Five light pulses along lower lid region of one eye of the participant ranging from 59 to 69 Joules (J) over an area of 2.5cm by 4.5cm for each pulse

Sham IPLdevice

Simulated five light pulses along lower lid region of the other eye of the same participant

LLLTdevice

Mask with LEDs transferring a total of about 32 J/cm\^2 of energy to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed