At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Difference in Aerosol-generating Amount Between Wired Magnetic-assisted Capsule Endoscopy System and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Examination of Varices in Biliary Atresia Patients
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating wired magnetic assisted capsule endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy for Esophageal Varices. Completed, enrolled 50 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safeness and effectiveness of traditional esophagogastroduodenoscope (EGD) and wired magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy (MACE) in the diagnosis of esophageal varices in biliary atresia (BA) patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Subjects who do wired magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy do not need to open the mouths during the process, this study also want to know whether wired magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy can reduce the generation of droplets. * Diagnostic accuracy between traditional esophagogastroduodenoscope and wired magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy in biliary atresia patients with esophageal varices. Participants will do either traditional esophagogastroduodenoscope or wired magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
once
once