At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction With Bilateral PanOptix Verses Bilateral Synergy
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Visual Acuity, Defocus Curve, and 2 other interventions for Pseudophakia. Completed, enrolled 230 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Background: * The Tecnis Synergy intraocular lens (IOL) has a claim to allow patients to experience continuous high-contrast vision from far through near even in low-light conditions. * A J\&J-sponsored post marketing study done outside of the US claim superiority of range of vision for the Tecnis Synergy IOL over the PanOptix IOL. Hypothesis: * Patients with bilateral Panoptix IOLs have non-inferior distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity compared to patients with bilateral Synergy IOLs in both photopic and mesopic conditions with less glare, haloes, and/or starbursts. Unmet Medical Need: * There is a need to look at patient visual outcomes and the visual disturbance profile comparing trifocal technology with combined EDOF/Bifocal technology in the United States.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Measurement of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity.
Measurement of visual acuity performed from +1.00 to -4.00 in 0.50 diopter steps and with +0.25 and -0.25 added.
Measurement to quantify degree of visual loss caused by either halo and/or glare.
Patients will complete a series of questionnaires to record self-reported visual disturbances, visual acuity satisfaction, level of spectacle independence and any issues with glare, halos, and/or starbursts.