At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Preservation vs Sacrifice of the Supraclavicular Nerve During Clavicle ORIF: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Nerve-sacrificing procedure and Nerve preserving procedure for Clavicle Fracture. Completed, enrolled 45 participants.
Detailed Summary
Clavicle fractures are a common orthopedic injury and make up 2.6%-5% of all fractures. Despite the benefits of operative management, post-operative chest wall paresthesia is a well-known complication among surgeons and is well described in the literature. Studies reporting on the natural history of post-operative paresthesia report an incidence of chest wall numbness anywhere from 10-80% and this is attributed to iatrogenic injury of the branches of the supraclavicular nerve that provide sensation over the clavicle, anteromedial shoulder and proximal chest. While this may seem like an easy complication to avoid, anatomic studies give insight into the complex and unpredictable branching of the supraclavicular nerve. The aim of this study was to compare the area (cm2) and change in size over time of post-operative paresthesia (includes hypesthesia and dysesthesia) following ORIF of displaced clavicle fractures between nerve-sacrificing and nerve-preserving procedures.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Surgical fixation of the clavicle fracture will be performed through a horizontal incision over the clavicle. During the incision and soft tissue dissection, the surgeon will not attempt to identify the supraclavicular nerve branches. Instead, the surgeon will cut the nerve branches during the dissection.
Surgical fixation of the clavicle fracture will be performed through the same horizontal incision over the clavicle. The surgeon will attempt to dissect out, identify and preserve all branches of the supraclavicular nerve throughout the fracture reduction, fixation and closure.