At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of EzVision® Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie-Assisted Machintosh Laryngoscopy in Patients Considering Difficult Intubation
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating EzVision® videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Blade for Intubation; Difficult or Failed and Airway Complication of Anesthesia. Completed, enrolled 70 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the EzVision® videoryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade in patients with suspected difficult intubation. This study primarily aims to test the hypothesis that laryngoscopy image is better with EzVision® videoryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. The secondary hypothesis is also to test the view that, compared to direct laryngoscopy, EzVision® videolingoscopy will improve intubation success, reduce intubation attempts, shorten intubation time, facilitate intubation, and cause less additional complications such as bleeding or sore throat.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Patient will be intubated with EzVision® videolaryngoscopy
Patient will be intubated with Macintosh Blade