CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Conventional +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06273189
NCT06273189N/ACompleted

Does Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel Improve Surgical Outcomes in SSRO?

TC Erciyes University·interventional·Posted Feb 22, 2024·Updated Feb 22, 2024

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Conventional and Bone Scalpel for Maxillofacial Abnormalities. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The conventional saw compared with the piezo surgery in BSSO to evaluate cutting time, surgery duration, amount of bleeding. The purpose of this study was to answers following clinical questions: Is ultrasonic bonescalpel effective osteotomy like conventional bur in BSSO? and 2) Does it reduce operative parameter like bleeding, duration, lingual split pattern? 3) Does it reduce postoperative morbidity after BSSO.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesTurkey (Türkiye)
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 22, 2024
Enrollment StartDec 15, 2018
Primary CompletionDec 15, 2020
Study CompletionDec 15, 2021
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 yearsPosted 2.4 years ago

Interventions

Conventionaldevice

In conventional group, contralateral side mandibular osteotomies were performed with Lindeman and round bur (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany)

Bone Scalpeldevice

In ultrasonic device group, osteotomies one side of the mandible were performed unilaterally using an ultrasonic bone scalpel (BoneScalpel; Misonix, Farmingdale, NY) with a serrated standard blade