CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 61 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Lignocaine +2 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06289790
NCT06289790N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block vs Intravenous Lignocaine Infusion in Video- Assisted Thoracoscopy (VATS)

Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland·interventional·Posted Mar 4, 2024·Updated Jan 21, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block, Lignocaine, and 1 other intervention for Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted. Completed, enrolled 61 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) block vs intravenous lignocaine infusion in video- assisted thoracoscopy (VATS. The main goals are to compare post- operative pain scores and cumulative post- operative opioid doses in both groups

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsThoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
CountriesPoland
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20252026
First PostedMar 4, 2024
Enrollment StartApr 11, 2024
Primary CompletionOct 10, 2025
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.5 yearsPosted 2.3 years ago

Interventions

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) blockprocedure

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block with bupivacaine and for pain management in VATS procedure

Lignocainedrug

Lignocaine bolus and infusion for pain management in VATS procedure

Bupivacainedrug

Bupivicaine with adrenaline will be used to perform the ESP block