At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Airway Management With Bronchial Blocker and Double-Lumen Tube in Single-Lung Ventilation
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (airway management with double-lumen tube) and Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (airway management with endobronchial blocker) for Heart Valvular Disease and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 66 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
In this study, the primary aim is to compare the impact of using a double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker for single-lung ventilation in patients undergoing minimal invasive cardiac surgeries on postoperative pulmonary functions. Secondary objectives include the comparison of application duration, success in lung collapse, and the number of repositioning attempts for both techniques.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Anesthesia induction will involve 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg propofol, and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium. Following anesthesia induction, a double-lumen tube will be inserted.Subsequently, patients will be connected to a mechanical ventilator. Tube placement will be confirmed using fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
Anesthesia induction will involve 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 1 µg/kg fentanyl, 1 mg/kg propofol, and 0.7 mg/kg rocuronium. Following anesthesia induction, endotracheal tube-bronchial blocker will be inserted.Subsequently, patients will be connected to a mechanical ventilator. Tube placement will be confirmed using fiberoptic bronchoscopy.