At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Clinical Evaluation of FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry for Assessing Implant Positions Compared to Standard Stereophotogrammetry
In Brief
An observational study evaluating Navigated Photogrammetry and Standard Photogrammetry for Doctor Efficiency and Dental Prosthesis Fit. Completed, enrolled 4 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome of Navigated Photogrammetry to standard stereophotogrammetry techniques in digital dentistry for the following two parameters: * The amount of time needed to prepare the provisional digital files for use in the lab, measured in direct doctor interaction time. * Suitability of delivered provisional occlusion. Participants will receive either a provisional manufactured by the output of Navigated Photogrammetry, or a provisional manufactured by the output of standard stereophotogrammetry.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Navigated Photogrammetry shall be performed following implant surgery, rather than standard stereophotogrammetry. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from FastMap Navigated Photogrammetry.
The patient will receive the existing patient care protocol that includes anatomy information for the manufacturing of the provisional. Specifically, the patient will receive a preoperative IntraOral Scan (IOS) anatomy scan with IOS-compatible fiducials. Following implant surgery, the patient will receive a scan with a standard stereophotogrammetry device. Additionally, they will receive a post-op alignment IOS with IOS-compatible anatomy fiducials and IOS-compatible implant scan bodies. The patient will then receive a provisional that was manufactured using the data from the standard stereophotogrammetry device.