CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 1,941 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Long Abstract +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06525805
NCT06525805N/ACompleted

Readers' Attention of Shorter Versus Longer Abstracts of Systematic Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial

University of Oldenburg·interventional·Posted Jul 29, 2024·Updated Nov 8, 2024

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Long Abstract and Short Abstract for Researchers Attention. Completed, enrolled 1,941 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to investigate the perceptions of researchers on systematic review (SR) abstracts. The primary objective will be to compare readers' attention of shorter versus longer abstracts. The secondary objective will be to assess the perception of an abstract based on four indicators of a well-written abstract: (a) Informativeness, (b) Accuracy, (c) Attractiveness, and (d) Conciseness. The study will involve researchers from all over the world who recently published an SR, regardless of their research field. To identify eligible authors, a search of MEDLINE (via PubMed) was conducted on May 5, 2024, for systematic reviews published between January 1, 2024, and March 26, 2024. A total of at least 6200 SRs will be selected from PubMed and assessed for eligibility. The corresponding author information will be extracted from all included SRs and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesGermany
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20252026
First PostedJul 29, 2024
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2024
Primary CompletionSep 30, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 monthsPosted 1.9 years ago

Interventions

Long Abstractother

The intervention and control group will be provided with a structured abstract of the review by Soderberg et al., entitled "Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones". This review was published once in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and once in the journal BJU International. The length of the abstract differs significantly depending on the journal. The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the longer version published in the Cochrane Database, comprising 771 words (PMID: 37955353).

Short Abstractother

The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the shorter version published in BJU International, comprising 277 words (PMID: 37942649).