At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
NCT06527638N/AActiveUpdate OverdueUpdated 6mo ago · Completion was 6mo agoPURI-PRO (Portuguese URinary Incontinence PROject) - Symptoms Impact and eHealth Intervention for Menopausal Women With Urinary Incontinence
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Experimental Group: eHealth intervention for UI symptoms improvement and Control Group: Delivery of a Health Literacy single-leaflet for Urinary Incontinence. Active but no longer recruiting, targeting 80 participants across 1 site.
Signals
Detailed Summary
Urinary Incontinence (UI) is a public health problem that disrupts the Quality of Life, Productivity, Social Isolation and Sexual Function; its prevalence in peri- and postmenopausal women is around 30-40%. UI remains underreported and undertreated. Previous eHealth interventions have been efficacious with women. Thus, PURI-PRO (Portuguese Urinary Incontinence Project) (FCT Grant 2020.05710.BD) entailed a low-cost 8-week eHealth cognitive-behavioural multidisciplinary intervention aimed at reducing UI symptoms' severity through Pelvic Floor Muscle Training, development of healthy bladder habits, and promotion of adherence to exercises, realistic UI-beliefs, and functional coping strategies. Urinary incontinence symptom severity, frequency and its impact on quality of life, beliefs and strategies regarding urinary incontinence, self-esteem, social isolation, and adherence to pelvic floor muscle excercises were evaluated.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The intervention was theoretically based on the HAPA model (including effective strategies in behaviour change, for example, action planning and coping with obstacles) and Common Sense Model of Self Regulation (beliefs, coping and appraisal), focusing on risk perception, planning, and self-efficacy. The intervention consisted of 8 sessions (90 minutes, once a week). All group intervention sessions, through the Zoom platform, were led by the psychologist responsible for the study, except the second session that was led by a physiotherapist. WhatsApp groups were created, to share experiences, knowledge, doubts and fears, and to create a sense of belonging, understanding and cohesion. All primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (one month later), post-intervention, and in a 3 month follow-up after the intervention.
A health literacy single-leaflet was delivered, by e-mail in the first week of the intervention. Beyond this, there was no further interaction with the group. All primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (one month later), post-intervention, and in a 3 month follow-up after the intervention.