CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 428 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Ventilation typeprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06537388
NCT06537388N/ACompleted

Comparison of High Frequency Jet Ventilation and Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for Endobronchial Ultrasound Examinations

Erasme University Hospital·observational·Posted Aug 5, 2024·Updated May 21, 2025

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Ventilation type for Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 428 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is frequently used in pneumology for diagnostic procedures like mediastinal biopsies. This procedure is usually done under general anesthesia. Different methods of ventilation are used according to center and physician preferences. In this retrospective study, complications of 2 types of ventilation will be analyzed: * High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) * Conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) Descriptive statistics will be used to present the data. Both ventilation techniques will be compared after propensity score matching. For HFJV patients from 2019 will be analyzed and for IPPV patients from 2023, as the team changed its practice over time.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesBelgium
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20252026
First PostedAug 5, 2024
Enrollment StartAug 15, 2024
Primary CompletionMar 30, 2025
Study CompletionMay 1, 2025
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8 monthsPosted 1.9 years ago

Interventions

Ventilation typeprocedure

Type of ventilation used during the EBUS procedure, either HFJV or IPPV