CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 44 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cold debriefing +1 morebehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06624449
NCT06624449N/ACompleted

The Effect of Hot and Cold Debriefing on BLS Competence and Reflection In Undergraduate Nursing Students.

University of Cincinnati·interventional·Posted Oct 3, 2024·Updated Nov 29, 2024

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Cold debriefing and Hot Debriefing for BLS Competence and Debriefing. Completed, enrolled 44 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training. The study aims to: * Identify the effect of hot versus cold debriefing in BLS training for nursing students. * Identify which debriefing method students prefer. Researchers will compare the two debriefing methods. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned (by flipping a coin) to either hot or cold debriefing. * Take part in a simulation about Basic Life Support.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
202420252026
First PostedOct 3, 2024
Enrollment StartAug 29, 2023
Primary CompletionMar 7, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 1.7 years ago

Interventions

Cold debriefingbehavioral

Manipulation (experimental): The researcher assigned a cold debriefing (after one-day post-simulation) for undergraduate nursing students in the intervention group.

Hot Debriefingbehavioral

The control group received a hot debriefing (immediately after the simulation).